|
Home - Industry Article - May 08 Issue |
Top 10 Laws for Being ‘SaaS-y’ |
By Byron Deeter, Partner, Bessemer Venture
Partners
Running an
on-demand company means abandoning many of the long-held tenets
of software management and adhering to these new principles.
In the emerging sector of Software as a Service, one of the
biggest challenges for many of the top CEOs is the lack of
successful role-model businesses. There are still only a handful
of public pure-play SaaS businesses, and thus the body of ‘best
practices’ is very limited. Ironically, on top of this, one of
the hardest things veteran software CEOs have to do when they
start to run a SaaS company is to forget much of what they know
about running a software company.
As we worked with our SaaS portfolio companies, it became
apparent that savvy SaaS companies were following a new set of
rules – most of which didn’t apply in the traditional software
world, and many of which they were making up in real-time. We
then set out to capture the new ‘best practices’ of the
on-demand model.
To pull these insights together, Bessemer studied over a hundred
SaaS companies – both pure-plays and hybrids – and recently
hosted an invitation-only SaaS CEO Summit to compare
perspectives and discuss the findings. Many of the insights
gained during this research and these discussions are condensed
into the following list of ten new ‘laws,’ which help govern the
success of SaaS companies.
-
Your Key Business Metrics Are: CMRR (Contracted Monthly Recurring Revenue) and Cash –
‘Bookings’ Are for Suckers.
All insightful, experienced software executives know that there
is a single critical metric by which the health of a
growth-software business can be judged: ‘Bookings.’ However, in
the SaaS world, ‘bookings’ is ambiguous at best and often very
misleading. A simple example would be if Customer A signs a
one-year deal at $10,000 per month, and Customer B signs a
three-year deal at $5,000 per month. The traditional metric of
Bookings would value Customer A at $120,000 and Customer B at
$180,000, despite the fact that any good SaaS CEO knows that
Customer A is much more valuable to the business as they will
likely generate $360,000 of revenue for the business with
renewals over that same three year period.
To achieve better business visibility, top-performing SaaS
companies have begun to focus on Monthly Recurring Revenue
instead of bookings. We recommend companies actually take this a
step further and keep a forward view of ‘contracted’ monthly
recurring revenue net of the expected churn. This metric,
Contracted Monthly Recurring Revenue (CMRR), is the single most
important metric for a SaaS business to monitor as the change in
CMRR provides the clearest visibility into the health of any
SaaS business.
Visibility into the current cash position and the change in the
cash position has always been important for software executives,
but is even more critical for SaaS businesses because the
working capital requirements are higher and the payment terms
are much longer. Given the high cost of capital for private SaaS
companies, wise executives will often offer slight MRR discounts
to customers in exchange for quarterly or annual pre-payment
terms.
A third metric to watch is customer churn, which is embedded
into our CMRR metric at the top level but should also be tracked
in deep detail by the management team. SaaS companies have to
remember the ‘Service’ in ‘Software-as-a-Service.’ It’s very
difficult and expensive to grow subscription businesses if you
have moderate customer churn, and prohibitive, if your churn is
high. The top performing SaaS companies typically achieve annual
renewals on a customer count basis above 90% (much of which is
often due to bankruptcies, acquisitions, and other events beyond
the company’s control), and over 100% renewals on a dollar value
basis due to up-sells into this installed base.
We believe in these metrics as SaaS value drivers so strongly,
that like to see executive teams tie their annual bonuses
directly these metrics almost exclusively.
It Takes At Least $300K of CMRR to Climb the Sales Learning
Curve – Stop at Three Sales Reps until At Least Two of Them Are
Making $100K MRR Quotas.
Years ago, Bessemer was fortunate to invest behind Mark Leslie
at Veritas and as a result our firm became big believers in a
concept Mark helped pioneer around the Sales Learning Curve (SLC).
The core concept is that software organizations often fail
because they staff up their sales efforts too quickly and make
them too large before the sales model has been refined.
The SLC worked well in the traditional enterprise software
business and works well for the SaaS model – with a few key
modifications. To understand when the business has started to
climb the sales learning curve and is in a position to hire more
reps profitably, you have to think in terms of CMRR instead of
bookings. You know you can profitably scale sales when a couple
of sales reps are at an annualized run rate to sign annual
contract values (MRR x 12 months) equal to twice their
fully-burdened cost of sales. For a direct, enterprise sales
business model, this is likely to be $80,000 – 100,000 MRR
(approx. $1 – 1.2M annualized), and for tele-sales models, this
may scale down to $60,000 – $75,000 MRR ($720,000 – $900,000
annualized). It is usually time to accelerate sales hiring when
at least two out of three sales reps are hitting quotas at these
numbers, and the business has at least $300,000 of CMRR.
Separate Your ‘Hunters’ and ‘Farmers’ – As Soon As You’ve
Climbed the Sales Learning Curve, Begin Ramping Your Sales Force
by Hiring Renewal-Oriented Account Managers. Keep the Hunters
Moving, and Let Farmers Tend to the Crops.
When a SaaS company starts to hit the sales inflection point, it
is important to keep the new business reps (the ‘hunters’) busy
with finding new deals, while a team of account managers (the
‘farmers’) tends the established customers. CMRR is a function
of new sales net of churn from your existing accounts, so you
should have dedicated experts for each of these two revenue
groups as soon as is practically possible. Once a company has a
few sales reps achieving quota and a significant customer base,
it is time to hire dedicated account management experts who are
compensated to focus exclusively on customer service, renewals
and upsells. These farmers should be compensated on the net
change in CMRR among their installed base accounts.
It’s a Whole New Ecosystem – Channels Are Very Hard for SaaS
Companies to Build, So Don’t Base Your Plan on SIs and
Traditional ISVs. You Will Need to Sell Directly for a Long
Time. SaaS products, by their nature, don’t require massive amounts of
systems integration (SI) work to implement, so they’re not a
great fit with the traditional SI business model. They don’t
pull through large stacks of hardware boxes and software
licenses so they’re not very attractive to traditional
independent software vendor (ISV) partners either. Channel
relationships are very hard for any small company to establish,
but even more difficult for most SaaS companies given the
restricted value proposition to the SI and ISV community.
Unfortunately, many software executives have spent years
building deep relationships with executives at the major
software and integration companies like IBM, Oracle, HP, and
Accenture…only to find they aren’t much help to SaaS businesses.
Most SaaS businesses have to be comfortable with the fact that
they will live or die by their ability to sell directly, and
only if they are successful alone will they be able to build
meaningful channel relationships with the new generation of
partners and resellers. In the interim, many SaaS businesses
focus on joint sales and marketing activities with the emerging
SaaS incumbents (Salesforce.com, Webex, etc.) and the new
generation of smaller, more nimble and SaaS-savvy SI firms.
Stay Local – Prove Your Business in North America First. Only
After Reaching $1M in CMRR Should You Consider Hiring European
Sales and Services Execs behind Customer Demand. Save Asia for
Post-IPO. Almost all businesses will look to go global at some point if
they continue to grow. But SaaS vendors face more barriers to
globalization than traditional software companies because you
can’t just localize the UI and ship a new CD to some remote
country. Given the different architecture and high service-level
expectations in the SaaS industry, companies are faced with
questions about latency, data access and security through
replicated local datacenters, in-country customer support
personnel, packaged integration with other regional software and
SaaS products, and other similar issues.
Simply put, North America is a massive market with a rising tide
around SaaS. There is no need to go global early and force this
cost and complexity upon your organization. A rough rule of
thumb is that you should look to pass $1M CMRR ($12M annualized)
before even considering Europe, and even then you should let
customer deals pull you into the region as you incrementally
hire sales and services professionals. Unless you have some
extremely unfair advantage in Asia, wait until Europe is a clear
home run before even considering opening up a sales war on
another front. Your default position should be to consider
Europe as your pre-IPO growth story, and Asia only after you’re
a high-flying public company.
One Datacenter – Invest Early in Backup and Disaster
Recovery, but Stick to One Data Center, At Least until Well
After IPO. SaaS companies have this debate all the time, and yet the recent
data is pretty clear: Most SaaS companies can get by with a
single datacenter in North America until well past their IPO. In
fact, Salesforce.com is approaching $1billion in revenue and
just recently announced plans for additional datacenters.
Data centers are extremely expensive and create significant
organizational complexity on every level. Many of the historical
issues around data backup, disaster recovery, and global
application latency that caused companies to add a second
datacenter can also now be better addressed in other ways.
Single Instance, Multi-Tenant – Have Only One Version of the
Code in Production. Really. ‘Just Say No’ to On-Premise
Deployments. This is a guiding architectural principle for best-of-breed SaaS
companies. The notion of multi-instance, single tenant situation
only applies to legacy software companies moving to a dedicated
hosting model because they don’t have the luxury of an
architectural re-design. It is possible to use virtualization to
provide multiple instances, but this hybrid strategy is very
inferior for the organization. If designing a SaaS product out
of the gate, the best situation is single instance,
multi-tenant. It is a hard and fast law that shouldn’t be
debated. Any CTO who thinks otherwise (for a conventional
use-case) should be fired.
By Definition, Your Sales Prospects Are Online – Savvy Online
Marketing is a Core Competence (Sometimes the Only One) of Every
Successful SaaS Business. You sell a product that requires an Internet connection and a
web browser for access, which means your prospects are online!
Numerous studies show that your customers are now doing most of
their primary research online. You should therefore be
aggressive in marketing to them online.
This is a clear example where business-to-business (B2B)
marketers need to learn from their business-to-consumer (B2C)
counterparts. The most innovative B2C companies are lead
generation machines, leveraging search engine optimization (SEO),
viral marketing, and other technically advanced methods. Yet
many B2B companies don’t have a clue.
The incumbent technology leaders like IBM, Oracle, or SAP, have
done very little with regard to marketing automation, search
engine optimization, search engine marketing, email marketing or
viral marketing. Private SaaS companies have so many
disadvantages against the larger incumbent vendors that it is
imperative for them to exploit this potential advantage. Whether
they use an automated product like Eloqua (as is the case with
almost a dozen of our companies) or a team of marketing analysts
and spreadsheets, online marketing is simply a must for SaaS
companies.
Constantly trade off cash vs. Growth – If You Must Replenish
Supplies While Still Crossing the Desert, Optimize Your Growth
Rate (Sales Rep Recruitment and Marketing Spending) So That You
Maximize Your Recurring Revenue Run Rate When You Need to
Fundraise Next. There’s no denying that the cash flow characteristics of a SaaS
business are wonderful in the long term, but lousy in the short
term. The traditional software model with $1 million licensed
software and ‘net 60’ payment terms presents a far rosier cash
flow picture than monthly subscription streams of $5,000 –
$50,000. This means SaaS companies must have impeccable
financial stewardship.
As a business, it is critical to weigh forward investments
carefully. SaaS businesses typically require multiple rounds of
investment and a good amount of capital.
Top execs must optimize functions around CMRR metrics – the
basis for subsequent valuations. If you are planning to raise
more funds in nine months, you need to invest in areas that will
produce measurable CMRR returns within that nine-month window
and often hold back on longer-term initiatives.
Be Prepared to Cross the Desert – SaaS Requires R&D and
Sales Expense Up Front for a Multi-Year Stream of Revenue, So It
Demands Enough Investment Capital to Fund 4+ Years of Runway.
Load Up for the Long Trip and Pace Your Consumption of Calories!
SaaS businesses provide wonderful visibility and predictability
at scale, but take lots of time and capital to get to cash flow
breakeven over several rounds of fundraising. There are many
good SaaS startups that stepped on the gas too early and were
wiped out as a result. Always model the business with a
comfortable cash cushion and recognize that most SaaS businesses
actually consume more short-term cash if you start growing
faster.
Bonus Law: You Can Ignore One of These Rules, but Not More –
Great Companies Innovate, but Pick Your Battles
You might be reading this and saying to yourself, “Well, our
sales model doesn’t match these laws, but I’m sticking with it
anyway….” To which we would say, “Go for it!” Nothing is
absolute, and we certainly believe it is possible to ignore one
of these core tenets and still succeed. Maybe it’s about the
ecosystem; maybe it’s the datacenter. Whatever that one
exception is – great! We welcome it. Many of our most successful
companies historically were able to run against one
well-established business principle and exploit this difference
successfully.
However, if you find yourself questioning several of these Ten
Laws, then it’s probably time to step back and take a hard look
at your business. As a former SaaS CEO myself and a current SaaS
investor, I have learned the hard way that much of the battle is
just learning from the mistakes of those who went before you. In
our analysis of more than a hundred SaaS businesses, we
encountered several successful companies that were on the
borderline with one or two of these laws each, but none that
challenged several of them. We hope that these laws can help you
run your SaaS business more effectively, and we always welcome
new insights in these or related areas.
Byron Deeter is Partner at Bessemer Venture Partners, a
top-tier international venture capital firm with 8 offices
worldwide and over $2B of assets under management. He was
previously the founding CEO of a Software-as-a-Service business
(Trigo Technologies) that was acquired by IBM in 2004, and
currently sits on the board of a half-dozen companies, including
three pure SaaS companies: Eloqua, Cornerstone OnDemand, and
Retail Solutions. For article feedback, contact Byron at
byron@bvp.com
|
|
|